Today I will talk about whether I would make changes to my career studies program, Forestry Engineering. In general I find the curriculum good, but it could be better. For example I find that some branches that are elective should be general branches and some general branches should be elective branches, such as Hydrology. I find that today the issue of water use management is very important, but unfortunately it is not a compulsory course but an elective one. There are also many branches that do not have a serious character, being that they are important for the career, such as leadership or public speaking and communication, but since they are not branches of Engineering they are not considered important for the students.
On the other hand, the practice 2 of frutillar has an extension of 4 weeks, I feel it is a long time for a practice, people get tired, need their space, among other factors. With regard to the faculty's infrastructure in general, it is small, has few laboratories of its own and those that do not have as many materials. They have to lease to the Faculty of Agronomy laboratories or rooms. It is not precarious nor just humble. Also the computer rooms or the own classes of the faculty are small, at the moment a lot of students are entering and the rooms can not cope. In addition, the rooms for teachers are also small. In general, that.
Goodbye, dear bloggers!
i also like too !
ResponderBorrar